13 Jun 2023 13:19:45
Reports from Italy that we've reached a deal with Kim Min-jae and it will go through on the 1st July when his clause is activated.

1.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 13:45:37
Hopefully this means that the wheels are in motion for HM to be moved on too.

2.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 13:56:28
A great start to the window if true, Hoijlund next hopefully.

3.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 16:13:03
Is Hoijlund what we need?
He's got potential but he's nowhere near the finished article and we will probably have to pay around 40-45 million pounds for him.
9 goals in Serie A isn't exactly a great total.
Wouldn't you rather pay an extra 40 million pounds on Harry Kane who guarantees your 25 gools a season?

4.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 17:21:02
He stated 20 games, subbed on in 12 simo, 9 goals 1 assist. Looks a good player from little I've seen, and seems to be getting attention from quite a few clubs.

Only Levy knows if he will sell Kane to Man Utd. I doubt he will strengthen Man Utd and weaken Tottenham, but sure Kane will leave for free next year. I don't think Kane would be £80m to us. I think Levy would have to WIN, so he would want £100m plus to appease the fans.

We also can't be too unhappy with Levy, no chance Fergy would have sold our star striker to a rival.

5.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 17:49:48
We need 2 strikers, I don’t want to miss the boat on yet another potential.

6.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 18:23:20
Seems to me we’ll see the young Danish striker and Greenwood as our additional strikers next season.

7.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 18:28:57
I’d take Hoijlund over Kane. Controversial I know, but I want us to dominate and compete long term and I don’t think Kane is the answer. We are 12 months too late for him.

8.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 19:22:13
Kane with Hoijland makes sense if you can afford it. The trick will be moving Kane on at the right time.

Then in the future identifying the right repllacement at the right time and bringing them in.

Ideally we want to be in the position where we have top quality starters and our incomings are the next Kane etc.

We have nothing top so is we can afford to bring in the Man, and the Next Man then we should.

9.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 19:31:22
He's got to be better than wehorst or martial. Nowhere as expensive as kane, ramos or osimhen and likely a lot lower wages also. I'd take a punt on him as he looks suited to English football. Looks like greenwood will be back next season aswell. Might divide some but having greenwood back will be good, he's going to be hungry and he's well rested, wouldn't be surprised to see him bag 20-30 and we will all be singing his name.

On a side note we need to get rashy a proper song/ chant he deserves a good one.

10.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 20:40:44
Those who say good to have Greenwood back better be ready for the relentless away crowds that will never let him forget this. I imagine a few of his own fans might boo him at OT even. But in the end, time is a healer.

11.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 21:07:03
Dodgy no doubt he will get stick, buy remember Beckham was the most hated man in the country after the wc 98 and he probably had his best season with us after and we won a treble, he played a massive part in that.

12.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 21:37:00
Not sure we can compare Beckham to Greenwood in this particular instance!

Still not sure how we can bring him back in to be honest. What does it say to our women’s side and all the female members of staff working for us. Because let’s be honest, he hasn’t been found guilty in a court of law through whatever reason, but we’ve all heard the recording and we know what we heard.

I know firmly where I stand in relation to whether he actually did what he was accused of. It’s a firm no from me.

13.) 13 Jun 2023
13 Jun 2023 21:41:30
Hoijlund and Greenwood this year, add Ferguson next year or two after developing at BHA. Strikers sorted for next decade. Move on to other areas. £40m outlay and recoup most of that on Martial if he can be moved on.

14.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 06:26:00
I expect us to go for ramos we seem to always go shopping in Portugal.

15.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 07:45:04
The sancho exit exit and greenwood coming back tend to fit. Assuming a striker comes on board and looking at who we have sancho maybe becomes surplus to requirements. Being a part time option at his cost will favor moving him rather than keeping him.

16.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 07:51:14
Who cares what some people in an away crowd say or do? If Greenwood doesn’t, I think we can handle it. If he’s ready, and the club want him back, and comes back with the right attitude, he’s a ready made No. 9 in our ranks and the best finisher in the club by a country mile.

17.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 07:46:52
I expect to see Greenwood in the pre season tour as part of the squad.

18.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 09:20:58
I'm not sure where I stand on Greenwood. Even if charges were dropped, we heard some pretty damning stuff. On the other hand, there's always more behind the scenes that we aren't aware of unless it all gets dragged out in court, and without that context it's hard to know what really happened. I know my wife and I have both said things which, if heard without context, in an isolated recording, would sound pretty damning.

I understand why some women at the club might be uncomfortable around him, absolutely, but you can't punish someone for something they may not have done, just because other people may feel uncomfortable around them. Lots of us have to work around people who make us feel uncomfortable for one reason or another, but unless they have provably done something actionable, you just have to accept it.

If he does return to the squad, I'm not sure where I see him fitting in. He's been used wide more than as a number 9, and while I do see him transitioning to number 9, it's too soon to rely on him there. However, out wide he'd be competing with Sancho, Antony and possibly Amad and/ or Pellestri. If we let Sancho go, then Greenwood can compete with Antony for now, but what happens in a year or two when he transitions to number 9? Unless Amad/ Pellestri make significant strides, we'd be back looking for a RW to compete with and back up Antony. I'd rather see us keep Sancho as a rotation option for both flanks, with Garnacho and Amad for additonal depth on the left and right respectively.

19.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 09:45:46
I must be going mad. Hoijlund over Kane lol.
Kane has at least 3 maybe 4 years left at the top and guarantees 20-25 goals every season alreaady proven, it's just a no brainer.
There is no argument on the Kane subject, he would be perfect for us.

20.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 10:29:04
Can’t disagree on the Kane thing. If we can get him I’d be delighted. He’s a class act.

21.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 10:30:07
I'm one of the Kane advocates on here, but it feels like it's slipping away, if it was ever on.
Trouble is, all we can go on is media headlines and social media, just like we are with the ownership debacle. No-one knows anything, and perception quickly spirals in either direction without any real cause.
I doubt many have seen much of Hojlund (including me) other than a few fancy YouTube showreels. It would be nice to get an upcoming striker.
It does feel as if Utd are gearing towards keeping Greenwood and slowly integrating him into things with an initial loan so they can gauge things. Then slowly bring him on in cameo appearances with his young family cheering happily in the wings until he's a first teamer again.

22.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 10:57:36
I want Kane and Hoijlund tbh and would pick Kane first but I just don’t think we will get him this summer.

23.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 12:37:06
I would like kane, it's just it will take up massive chunk of the budget, where as we could use that money to sign 2 or 3 players. We won't get any money back for him when he leaves and we will be back to square 1.

24.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 13:30:59
I still think we should have pushed harder for Sesko in January. He'd have been really useful for the second half of the season, offering everything Weghorst does, but with goals too. He'd also make a great backup/ rotation option behind a more experienced striker for the coming season, with plenty of potential to develop into our first choice striker in a few years.

Sadly he's not available now unless we pay far more than we should be paying for a high potential understudy (although it looks like we might be paying over the odds for one anyway in Hoijlund, and I'm not convinced he's as good as Sesko) .

25.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 13:31:52
In and ideal world we sign Kane and another striker such as Højlund.

I disagree that Kane will score between 80 and 100 goals for us over the next 3-4 years. The guy is 30, and has had injury issues in the past.

How many goals did Wayne Rooney score for us between the ages of 30-34?

What about Robin van Persie?

In fact how many EPL strikers can anyone name who have scored 80-100 goals between the ages of 30 to 34?

The only one I'd have guessed at would be Shearer, just checked he score 68 goals between the ages of 30 and 34.

So to say you would guarantee that Kane would score 20-25 goals over the next 4 years means you are literally guaranteeing something that has never even been close to being done before.

Kane would be great for the next 2 years, but we would need a replacement before then.

Which is fine if either we have money to burn to pay the 100m that Spurs will demand, or unless we somehow get him for 60-70m.

26.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 14:30:46
Not the injury card again lol. :p
I think he'd certainly reach Shearer's record if he joined us or Chelsea, but he can still do that at Spurs. Time after time he's been convinced by a new manager to stay with them and fulfil his goals (see what I did there), only to be in a far worse place at the end of the season than he started in terms of being in a winning team. Yet he continues to score at an incredible rate, so if that Shearer record is more important to him than winning something else then maybe he's at the right place. I'm sure any new Spurs manager would want to keep him, but from the outside looking in it certainly looks like Spurs need a complete overhaul over keeping one player.

27.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 15:00:46
If kane doesn't push for it, it won't happen. Simple.

What have you heard from kane and his camp? If he doesn't want to rock the boat. And fair play if he wants to be a loyal Spurs legend, than accept it and move on. By all means give Levy your best offer and a time limit. But don't make Kane a saga. Levy will take us on a merry dance.

28.) 14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023 17:48:31
Yes, Kane is good enough for Real Madrid, but isn't good enough for Manchester United. ?.

29.) 15 Jun 2023
15 Jun 2023 04:42:43
I haven't seen anyone say Kane isn't good enough. You'll have to point out who said it and where?

30.) 15 Jun 2023
15 Jun 2023 08:55:53
You haven't directly say those words, but you basically did, finding reasons not to sign him, be it for his injury record, or because of the fact that other players haven't scored 80 goals, or 20 per season between 30-34 y. o.

So, why would Real Madrid want him then? Or Bayern?

If he is good enough, he will score, same as Benzema, Leva and any other quality player. His advantage is that he isn't just a goalscorer, he is also a good playmaker, which gives us an extra option.

Im not talking about Levy here and I wouldn't let it drag out, but if it were to happen, Kane would be a great signing for us.

31.) 15 Jun 2023
15 Jun 2023 12:40:30
It would be nice for a change, if we could buy a young guy at a reasonable price, who then turns out to be great and triples his value.

Dortmund seem to be masters of this and clean out a lot of clubs with stupid transfer fees.

Makes life a lot easier too as we don't get into these long protracted deals, where we eventually pay the asking price which are eye watering.

Unless kane comes out and wants a move we should not bother getting entangled into another brain damage deal.